CrPC Section 464: Effect of omission to frame, or absence of, or error in, charge
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter 35: Irregular Proceedings
Repealed on 1 July 2024 and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS).
464. Effect of omission to frame, or absence of, or error in, charge.- (1) No finding sentence or order by a Court of competent jurisdiction shall be deemed invalid merely on the ground that no charge was framed or on the ground of any error, omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder of charge, unless, in the opinion of the Court of appeal, confirmation or revision, a failure of justice has in fact been occasioned thereby.
(2) If the Court of appeal, confirmation or revision is of opinion that a failure of justice has in fact been occasioned, it may
(a) in the case of an omission to frame a charge, order that a charge be framed and that the trial be recommenced from the point immediately after the framing of the charge.
(b) in the case of an error, omission or irregularity in the charge, direct a new trial to be had upon a charge framed in whatever manner it thinks fit:
Provided that if the Court is of opinion that the facts of the case are such that no valid charge could be preferred against the accused in respect of the facts proved, it shall quash the conviction.
Bare act text for reference, current to 30 June 2024. It is not legal advice; check the official gazette for authoritative text.
Other sections in this chapter
- 460. Irregularities which do not vitiate proceedings
- 461. Irregularities which vitiate proceedings
- 462. Proceedings in wrong place
- 463. Non-compliance with provisions of section 164 or section 281
- 465. Finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity
- 466. Defect or error not to make attachment unlawful