हिंदी में पढ़ें

Section 10: Severability

Right to Information Act, 2005 · Current English text and original study guidance. Independent educational content, not legal advice or a government service.

Understand this section

A non-exempt portion may be provided when it can reasonably be separated from exempt information. Ask for the accessible remainder rather than assuming that one protected passage justifies withholding an entire file; the notice must explain the decision and review rights.

Original Banaka explanation · checked 30 September 2026 · not a substitute for the statute.

Related guide, examples and knowledge check →

English statutory text

DoPT consolidated edition, 18 November 2025. Line wrapping and PDF footnote numbers removed; consolidation brackets and omission marks retained. See the official PDF for amendment footnotes and schedules.

10. Severability.

(1) Where a request for access to information is rejected on the ground that it is in relation to information which is exempt from disclosure, then, notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, access may be provided to that part of the record which does not contain any information which is exempt from disclosure under this Act and which can reasonably be severed from any part that contains exempt information.

(2) Where access is granted to a part of the record under sub-section (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall give a notice to the applicant, informing—

(a) that only part of the record requested, after severance of the record containing information which is exempt from disclosure, is being provided;

(b) the reasons for the decision, including any findings on any material question of fact, referring to the material on which those findings were based;

(c) the name and designation of the person giving the decision;

(d) the details of the fees calculated by him or her and the amount of fee which the applicant is required to deposit; and

(e) his or her rights with respect to review of the decision regarding non-disclosure of part of the information, the amount of fee charged or the form of access provided, including the particulars of the senior officer specified under sub-section (1) of section 19 or the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission, as the case may be, time limit, process and any other form of access.