Essay

Anti-Federalist No. 67: Cato IV on the Presidency

“Cato” (pseudonym; often attributed to George Clinton) · New-York Journal, November 8, 1787

Text from Documentary History of the Ratification. Explanation last updated September 29, 2026. How we check this

Banaka study guide

In plain English

In Cato IV, published on November 8, 1787, the writer known as “Cato” criticizes the presidency created by Article II. He says its vague election provisions, its four-year term, its powers of appointment, command of the armed forces and pardon, and its resemblance to the British king could lead to an executive who governs for life.

The essay is a leading Anti-Federalist critique of executive power and the counterpart to Hamilton’s defense of a single, energetic executive in Federalist No. 70.

Each side of the ratification debate answered the other. Read the reply before the full text. The numbering of the two series is different, so these essays are related by topic, not by number.

How the argument unfolds

The executive branch first

Cato begins with the executive because it is “the chief” branch and therefore “entitled by the rules of rank to the first consideration.” He summarizes the second article: a president and vice president elected for four years, with qualifications, succession and impeachment provisions.

Vagueness in the election clause

He says the opening paragraph of Article II is “vague and inexplicit” about how a president is chosen after the first four-year term. Without clear terms for later elections, “this inexplicitness perhaps may lead to an establishment for life.”

Duration and ambition

Citing Montesquieu, Cato argues that in a republic “the greatness of the power must be compensated by the brevity of the duration.” A president with great power, patronage and a long tenure, he warns, might come to think he can be “great and glorious by oppressing his fellow citizens.”

The president compared with a king

Cato asks how the president, “invested with his powers and prerogatives,” essentially differs from the king of Great Britain apart from name. He points to command of the army and navy, pardons, the treaty and appointment powers, and the qualified veto over legislation. He also calls the vice presidency “as unnecessary as it is dangerous” because it blends executive and legislative powers.

The state comparison and the “court”

He warns that the seat of government will attract a court-like circle of officials, and urges readers not to be misled by the resemblance to their own state governors, who are checked by the legislature and lack powers of war and peace. The new government, he concludes, is no more like a true picture of their own than “an Angel of darkness resembles an Angel of light.”

The text

As printed by the source cited at the end of this page, with its original spelling, capitalization and punctuation.

To the Citizens Of the State of New-York

Admitting, however, that the vast extent of America, together with the various other reasons which I offered you in my last number, against the practicability of the just exercise of the new government are insufficient to convince you; still it is an undeniable truth, that its several parts are either possessed of principles, which you have heretofore considered as ruinous, and that others are omitted which you have established as fundamental to your political security, and must in their operation. I will venture to assert—fetter your tongues and minds, enchain your bodies, and ultimately extinguish all that is great and noble in man.

In pursuance of my plan, I shall begin with observations on the executive branch of this new system; and though it is not the first in order, as arranged therein, yet being the chief, is perhaps entitled by the rules of rank to the first consideration. The executive power as described in the 2d article, consists of a president and vice-president, who are to hold their offices during the term of four years; the same article has marked the manner and time of their election, and established the qualifications of the president; it also provides against the removal, death, or inability of the president and vice-president—regulates the salary of the president, delineates his duties and powers; and lastly, declares the causes for which the president and vice-president shall be removed from office.

Notwithstanding the great learning and abilities of the gentlemen who composed the convention, it may be here remarked with deference, that the construction of the first paragraph of the first section of the second article, is vague and inexplicit, and leaves the mind in doubt, as to the election of a president and vice-president, after the expiration of the election for the first term of four years—in every other case, the election of these great officers is expressly provided for; but there is no explicit provision for their election in case of the expiration of their offices, subsequent to the election which is to set this political machine in motion—no certain and express terms as in your state constitution, that statedly once in every four years, and as often as these offices shall become vacant, by expiration or otherwise, as is therein expressed, an election shall be held as follows, &c.—this inexplicitness perhaps may lead to an establishment for life.

It is remarked by Montesquieu, in treating of republics, that in all magistracies, the greatness of the power must be compensated by the brevity of the duration; and that a longer time than a year, would be dangerous. It is therefore obvious to the least intelligent mind, to account why, great power in the hands of a magistrate, and that power connected, with a considerable duration, may be dangerous to the liberties of a republic—the deposit of vast trusts in the hands of a single magistrate, enables him in their exercise, to create a numerous train of dependants—this tempts his ambition, which in a republican magistrate is also remarked, to be pernicious and the duration of his office for any considerable time favours his views, gives him the means and time to perfect and execute his designs—he therefore fancies that he may be great and glorious by oppressing his fellow citizens, and raising himself to permanent grandeur on the ruins of his country.—And here it may be necessary to compare the vast and important powers of the president, together with his continuance in office with the foregoing doctrine—his eminent magisterial situation will attach many adherents to him, and he will be surrounded by expectants and courtiers—his power of nomination and influence on all appointments—the strong posts in each state comprised within his superintendance, and garrisoned by troops under his direction—his controul over the army, militia, and navy—the unrestrained power of granting pardons for treason, which may be used to screen from punishment, those whom he had secretly instigated to commit the crime, and thereby prevent a discovery of his own guilt—his duration in office for four years: these, and various other principles evidently prove the truth of the position—that if the president is possessed of ambition, he has power and time sufficient to ruin his country.

Though the president, during the sitting of the legislature, is assisted by the senate, yet he is without a constitutional council in their recess—he will therefore be unsupported by proper information and advice, and will generally be directed by minions and favorites, or a council of state will grow out of the principal officers of the great departments, the most dangerous council in a free country.

The ten miles square, which is to become the seat of government, will of course be the place of residence for the president and the great officers of state—the same observations of a great man will apply to the court of a president possessing the powers of a monarch, that is observed of that of a monarch—ambition with idleness—baseness with pride—the thirst of riches without labour—aversion to truth—flattery—treason— perfidy—violation of engagements—contempt of civil duties—hope from the magistrates weakness; but above all, the perpetual ridicule of virtue—these, he remarks, are the characteristics by which the courts in all ages have been distinguished.

The language and the manners of this court will be what distinguishes them from the rest of the community, not what assimilates them to it, and in being remarked for a behaviour that shews they are not meanly born, and in adulation to people of fortune and power.

The establishment of a vice president is as unnecessary as it is dangerous. This officer, for want of other employment, is made president of the senate, thereby blending the executive and legislative powers, besides always giving to some one state, from which he is to come, an unjust pre-eminence.

It is a maxim in republics, that the representative of the people should be of their immediate choice; but by the manner in which the president is chosen he arrives to this office at the fourth or fifth hand, nor does the highest votes, in the way he is elected, determine the choice—for it is only necessary that he should be taken from the highest of five, who may have a plurality of votes.

Compare your past opinions and sentiments with the present proposed establishment, and you will find, that if you adopt it, that it will lead you into a system which you heretofore reprobated as odious. Every American whig, not long since, bore his emphatic testimony against a monarchical government, though limited, because of the dangerous inequality that it created among citizens as relative to their rights and property; and wherein does this president, invested with his powers and prerogatives, essentially differ from the king of Great-Britain (save as to name, the creation of nobility and some immaterial incidents, the offspring of absurdity and locality) the direct prerogatives of the president, as springing from his political character, are among the following:—It is necessary, in order to distinguish him from the rest of the community, and enable him to keep, and maintain his court, that the compensation for his services; or in other words, his revenue should be such as to enable him to appear with the splendor of a prince; he has the power of receiving ambassadors from, and a great influence on their appointments to foreign courts; as also to make treaties, leagues, and alliances with foreign states, assisted by the senate, which when made, become the supreme law of the land: he is a constituent part of the legislative power; for every bill which shall pass the house of representatives and senate, is to be presented to him for approbation; if he approves of it, he is to sign it, if he disapproves, he is to return it with objections, which in many cases will amount to a compleat negative; and in this view he will have a great share in the power of making peace, coining money, &c. and all the various objects of legislation, expressed or implied in this Constitution: for though it may be asserted that the king of Great-Britain has the express power of making peace or war, yet he never thinks it prudent so to do without the advice of his parliament from whom he is to derive his support, and therefore these powers, in both president and king, are substantially the same: he is the generalissimo of the nation, and of course, has the command & controul of the army, navy and militia; he is the general conservator of the peace of the union—he may pardon all offences, except in cases of impeachment, and the principal fountain of all offices & employments. Will not the exercise of these powers therefore tend either to the establishment of a vile and arbitrary aristocracy, or monarchy? The safety of the people in a republic depends on the share or proportion they have in the government; but experience ought to teach you, that when a man is at the head of an elective government invested with great powers, and interested in his re-election, in what circle appointments will be made; by which means an imperfect aristocracy bordering on monarchy may be established.

You must, however, my countrymen, beware, that the advocates of this new system do not deceive you, by a fallacious resemblance between it and your own state government, which you so much prize; and if you examine, you will perceive that the chief magistrate of this state, is your immediate choice, controuled and checked by a just and full representation of the people, divested of the prerogative of influencing war and peace, making treaties, receiving and sending embassies, and commanding standing armies and navies, which belong to the power of the confederation, and will be convinced that this government is no more like a true picture of your own, than an Angel of darkness resembles an Angel of light.

Context and current status

Cato’s fourth letter appeared in the New-York Journal in November 1787, while New York’s ratifying convention was months away. It was one of many attacks on the proposed executive. Historians note that the “Cato” pseudonym is commonly attributed to George Clinton, then New York’s governor, but the attribution is not certain.

Some of Cato’s fears did not come to pass, and others found later expression: the Twenty-Second Amendment limited presidents to two elected terms, and the Twelfth clarified the vote for President and Vice President. The essay is a historical argument and not a legal authority.

Terms to know

Executive
The branch that carries out the law; in the Constitution, the President.
Magistrate
In eighteenth-century usage, a public official with governmental power, including the chief executive.
Prerogative
Special powers or privileges belonging to a ruler.
Montesquieu
The French political thinker whose ideas about republics, separation of powers and the duration of office were cited by both sides.

Common misconceptions

“Cato’s letters are an official commentary on the Constitution.”

They are one writer’s opposition to the proposed Constitution and reflect a minority view during ratification.

Links to related provisions and documents, with the reason each one matters here.

Study check

Check your understanding of Cato IV

Choose an answer, then check it. Scoring happens in your browser; your answers are not sent anywhere.

  1. 1.Which branch does Cato IV examine first?
  2. 2.What might the vague election clause lead to, in Cato’s view?
  3. 3.Whom does Cato compare the president with?
  4. 4.Cato calls the establishment of a vice president unnecessary and dangerous.

Sources and corrections

Educational material, not legal advice. Spotted a mistake? Tell us; corrections change this page’s update date.